Hi C.H.:
> You have forgot to mention the 135/4.5 macro, which is an excellent macro,
> with resolution even higher than my 135/2.8 at infinity.
A few people have been waiting for me to test my 135 f/4.5, at infinity,
against a 135 f/3.5 (or f/2.8 if I could borrow one). Looks like you answered
this question for all of us. I had some barely acceptable results with the
f/4.5 at infinity many years ago and never attempted infinity focus with the
135 mm f/4.5 thereafter. Looks like I might have just had a case of camera
shake. I was standing in a bog at the time, I seem to recall. They bounce
like a trampoline.
Gary Reee
Las Vegas, NV
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|