Winsor wrote:
>I would vote with my credit card for a 35/1.4. If Oly wanted to best
the
>others, perhaps it could be one of those in between apertures like 1.2.
I
>can't think of a more useful low light lens for handheld shots.
Shooting at
>F1.4 or 1.2 at a relatively stable one over the focal length speed of
1/30
>of a second. This type of lens is almost the only reason I have ever
had to
>envy the Nikon system.
>
I'll second, that, though I don't have a credit card, I'd be prepared to
do some serious saving.
I think a 200mm macro is too specialized for something like a
commerorative edition, and the 35 more widely useful (and easier to
market/advertise)
Regards
Andy
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|