One more thing. There is one photo on the Oly gallery I took with this lens
(and
another with the 300 f/4.5) Course, can't tell a whole lot from computer
screen, can ya?
george
.
Giles wrote:
> George
>
> How about the contrast and Bokeh? Aside from sharpness, these
> are the qualities that most impress me about the 180mm f2. Do these
> qualities hold true for the 250mm f2, I have always wanted to know?
>
> Giles
>
> > Gary;
> >
> > I bought it for 2 main reasons: wildlife and astrophotography. I haven't
> > actually
> > been able to use it as mucn as I'd like for either. Oh well, tomorrow's
> > another
> > day.
> >
> > Not trying to be flip, but based on small experience actually using the
> > thing in
> > the past year:
> >
> > Cons: HEAVY
> > Pros: Fast, silky-smooth focussing, fast, sharp, fast, beautiful, bright
> > viewfinder image, sharp, works great with 1.4 and 2x AND with both of 'em
> > stacked
> > (700 F/5.6) slides of moon were STILL sharp. Fits in my new backpack with 4T
> > mounted. Did I mention it's sharp as a tack? And fast?
> >
> > george
> >
> > Oh yeah, forgot another con: It costs what $3700 to 4500 new depending on
> > who you
> > believe. Mine was 600f the lower number used, probably condition EX- Price
> > included a brand new front element and a clean/adjust at Olympus service.
> > Do I
> > think that's what it's worth? I dunno. I'll decide if I ever want to sell
> > it. Now
> > please don't embarass me and tell the group that you saw one in a pawn shop
> > for
> > $375 last week <g>
> >
> > Oh, and I know someone else on the list has or had the 350. I think it was
> > one of
> > the Johns out there.
> >
> >
> > george
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|