Subject: | Re: [OM] 100mm/f2 |
---|---|
From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 14 Jun 1998 22:37:39 EDT |
Hi John: > In my own experience I > bought the 28mm first due to economic reasons. When I could (finally) > afford the 24mm, I found a perfectly fine 28 sits in its case most of the > time; I always reach for the 24 first. Same with me, except that for landscapes the 35 mm f/2.8 is the most reached for, followed by the 24 mm f/2.8 and then the 50 mm f/2.0 Macro. I can't recall having used the 28 mm f/2.8 in months. Tis a shame . . . the 24 mm really orphaned it. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 100mm/f2, PCACala |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM FS, new prices, moon mullins |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100mm/f2, PCACala |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100mm/f2, Jim Loudon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |