>Olympians,
>
>My main interests in photography are people, and to a lesser extent,
>landscapes. For the first, my main lens is a Zuiko 135/f2.8, but I'm
>considering buying a 100/f2 as a portrait lens, expensive and thin on
>the ground as they are here in Sydney. Does anyone have an opinion
>(silly question, I know) as to whether it's worth the hard-earned? The
>f2 focusses to 0.7 metres, which would be great for full frame face
>shots.
>
>If that's not where my money goes, I'll get a 28/f2 or 2.8 to replace my
>just barely acceptable T*mr*n 28-70 zoom instead, which I only use for
>wide angles.
>
>Thanks
>
>Andy
>
Why not get an 85/F2? Lots cheaper and a superb lens for portraits or
landscape.
Winsor
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|