On Ven, 22 mag 1998 11:19, Gary Schloss <mailto:schloss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Performance-wise, the 35-105 is, IMHO, terrific: very sharp and
>almost too contrasty (I like it. YMMV, especially if you want to
>use the 85-105 range for portraits). For whatever reason, this
>is one of the more expensive medium-range Zuiko zooms, new or
>used. (Same price paradox exists in the AF Olympus lineup). To
>summarize: if you can afford one, you won't be disappointed.
>
Thanks for the hint. How well it compares to 85 2, 100 2.8, 75-150 and
85-250 and 100-200 for portraiture? And to 35-70s for general purpose?
Why don't you write a "subjective" Zuiko file a la Ruether?
Thanks again,
Marco
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|