Aaaaaarghhhh! Did anyone else get a twisted brain from trying to
read this? ;-)
Giles
snip
>
>
>
> Interesting Marco. Do you know anything about the 300/6.3 and
> 400/4.5 that originally was in the OM-system? If the 400/6.3 is to
> be considered a heavy lens, I wonder what is to be said about the
> 400/> I have two seemingly identical manuals for Zuiko lens group,
> one with and one without those lenses mentioned. The first is
> dated 0173 on the back, and the other 1077. The 400/4.5 seems to
> have been a> In spite of the weight and size of the 400/4.5
> hand-held photography is still possible according to the manual.
> Anyone have an idea to the origin and fate of these lenses?
>
> Per Nordenberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|