Subject: | Re: [OM] Winder 1 too Winder 2 ? |
---|---|
From: | "R. Lee Hawkins" <lhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 May 1998 12:47:51 -0400 |
Cc: | lhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In your message dated: Fri, 15 May 1998 15:10:46 +0200 you write: >Didn=B4t you write in your own FAQ, that you have to conect the chassi to >get an seqence mode? No, I didn't.... Cheers, --Lee < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism)...., Richard Schätzl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Professionals using Olympus, *- DORIS FANG -* |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Winder 1 too Winder 2 ?, Richard Schätzl |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Winder 1 too Winder 2 ?, Paul haigney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |