John A. Prosper wrote:
>
> You may want to gibe Gary Schloss a shout here. I believe
> he has experience with the 28-48/4. Several posters can
> offer their testimonies on the 35-105. I haven't used any
> of them.
Does anyone have any real-world experience they may want to share?
Gary? You talkin to me?
>
> All I am advising is that you match modern zooms (e.g.,
> 35-70/3.6, 35-80/2.8) against their fixed counterparts of
> similar design (in this case, pro) construction (e.g., the
> latest incarnation of the 50/1.2, 90/2, 100/2). I think the
> 24-48/4 was a pre-1980 design, and the 35-105 is definitely
> modern.
>
--
I got it. Good advice. I certainly would NOT be surprised if the 35-80
F/2.8 were to look good vs the primes. Could it be that perhaps the
35-105 is a contender for a near-prime lens experience?
george :>)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|