I agree. There is something wrong with your sample, perhaps impact or
separation (though I've never seen a separated element in the 200 f4). I'll
bet it didn't leave the factory with such performance.
John
www.zuiko.com
Marco wrote:
> On Ven, 1 mag 1998 4:24, Ara Oshagan
> <mailto:oshagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Now for a query. I just bought a zuiko 200/f4 from KEH and I have
> >already packed it to be sent back. The problems: 1) does not focus at
> >infinity and 2)I see a ton of color fringing on edges (bluishness in
> >this case). I suspect the latter is due to non-APO-ness. Has anyone run
> >across these problems? With lens? All my other zuikos are fantastically
> >sharp and with very accurate color rendition. The quality of this one
> >was quite dissapointing... and surprinsing: I guess even zuikos can be
> >lemons.
>
> There's something wrong with the sample you tested: common 200 4 Zuikos are
> good as any other Zuiko lens.
>
> Marco
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|