Dagfinn Karlsen wrote:
>
> I am seriously considering a Zuiko wide angle, 24mm or 28mm.
>
> Does anybody have any experience with the 24/2.8 or 28/2.8? I am thinking
> now in terms of sharpness and flare resistance. Compared to the f2.0
> versions of the same lenses, how good are the cheaper f2.8 ones?
I had the 2,8 28mm Zuiko, it was a sharp lens.
I did a lot of pictures with high contrast lighting through the deep
standing sun, no problems with flare and ghosting.
Now, I´m the proud owner of an 2,0 28mm Zuiko, as sharp as the 2,8 28mm
Zuiko.
Recently i took some pictures of an interior scene, with high contrast
lighting through some windows. I had to fight with some ghosting, it
seemed to me that the 2,0 is more vunerable to ghosting then the 2,8
Zuiko.
Sadly, I could not do a comparison between the two lenses. I did the
comparison with some N**on lenses and they showed the same problem.
snip..
> And another question: Should I buy a 24mm or a 28mm? I usually use my 50mm,
> shooting people, architecture and some landscape. I'd like to hear other
> people's preferences. Why should I decide for one and not the other?
For the use with an 50mm lens I would recomend an 28mm lens.
Richard
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|