> Finally, here's a hot tip from our lens
>expert: although the OM Zuiko lens line is
>inconsistent and their worst lenses me-
>diocre, few photographers realize that the
>best of the Olympus lenses hold their own
>with the very best from Leica, Zeiss, and
>others, The Zuiko 50mm f /2 Macro is a
>spectacular normal lens that we have the
>temerity to rate as high as the Leica 5Omm
>f/2 Summicron-M. And the Zuiko 90mm f/2
>Macro gives likes of the Zeiss 100mm f/2.8
>Macro a run for its money. Finally, the 35-80mm
>f/2.8 is one of the best normal zooms ever made
>in terms of pure optical quality. Chosen carefully,
>an Olympus Zuiko lens set can offer the highest
>possible optical quality for what are, comparatively,
>very sensible prices.
So what are the best and the worst Zuiko lenses? I know
I bought the 200mm f4 because I was dissatisfied with the
star rendition of the 75-150mm f4, which left a lot of
coma on the edge of the image (on astrophotos). But for
daytime use, it is still excellent! I think the problem
comes from the fact that it is a zoom lens, with twice
as many different lenses as a standard fixed-focal lens.
)))) Daniel Biron
)))) Montreal QC Canada
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|