Subject: | [OM] How much computing power is needed to break defraction |
---|---|
From: | Larry Griffin <larry.giles.griffin@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2023 08:52:26 -0700 |
I’ve never been much interested in macro photography, but this could change that. A report just released from the research labs in Sydney Australia says defraction has been broken. Lots of questions https://thedebrief.org/unbreakable-barrier-broken-new-superlens-technique-will-finally-allow-scientists-to-see-the-infinitesimal/ Larry at the gateway to Yosemite -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] *****SPAM*****: Anglesey was - 1000mm. In Seattle, Nathan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] How much computing power is needed to break defraction, usher99--- via olympus |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] 1000mm. In Seattle, Larry Griffin |
Next by Thread: | [OM] How much computing power is needed to break defraction, usher99--- via olympus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |