On 7/13/2023 3:51 PM, usher99--- via olympus wrote:
Thanks for the alternate rendition, Moose. Wish the tiff hadn’t vanished. I uprezzed the only little jpeg I had with Gigapixel AI and thus some
star artifacts. The monument had a minor alignment issue overlaying the stacked sky and foreground shots. I was already 3 hours into it. Many
use a utility to eliminate the green cast— typically sky glow from exited oxygen at 558nm. Sensor is very sensitive there. Back 5 years
ago when I started, wide angle astrolandscape was a very tiny niche. Now there are plug -ins to “make small stars.” This enhances the
prominence of the MW. Accuracy is often not the goal. If you have time, may ask you to have a look before a print after get some time for a re-do.
Love to, as long as it's before the first week of September, when we head your way.
😁
Chasing stars and flutterbys, Mike
There are much worse ways to spend one's time!
Star Struck Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|