Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Really not trying to be opaque in any way. The differences between the PL 100-400 (Panny-Leica) and the MZ 100-400 should be of general interest. The Pentax close up (CU) diopter T132 really performs remarkably well on the PL 100-400 and the MZ but any performance differences at higher mags for small butterflies is not clear. It is very difficult to predict how an achromatic CU diopter will behave on a given lens. Crystal clear? Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses, DZDub |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses, DZDub |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |