On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:55 AM Frank <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The difference is interesting.
>
> Because m43 is 4:3 and the lens is designed for 3:2, could it be that it
> somehow 'concentrates the rays' a bit for additional sharpness?
>
> Obviously not enough to change the f stops, however it is beyond my
> understanding anyway ;-)
>
Mine too. But I think it is just made really well. If the "concentrating
the rays" were accomplished by designing for 3:2 and deploying for 4:3, we
should notice improvement when we stick those Zuikos on a E or m43 body,
shouldn't we? I did think there was a bit of improvement in doing that,
but I think it was because the E bodies did not have Shutter Shudder. (Now
there's an old thread...)
The capabilities of the mZ 100-400, coupled to the EM-1iii, just seem
miraculous to me. Once AG had access to a Zuiko 600mm and I got to try it
but didn't want to waste a frame of film with it because I just couldn't
make it focus. Now, while I wouldn't say the only limitation is me, that's
surely the greatest limitation.
Joel W.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|