Better Late Moose writes,
<<Late to the party?
<<Both of these have, to my eye, a distinct magenta cast. I think it was the
flesh tones of the Bhutanese woman that bothered me, at first. But the cast is
overall.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/Color/Ektar100Color.htm>
Thanks for looking at these. Skin tones should be correct. One thing I did
not appreciate is that some scanning software interacts oddly with Ektar
leading to such casts. That is not like the spectral peculiarities of Ektar
where the blue can go near nuclear in the shadows under some conditions.
Silverfast does not do that I read. The scan was actually very nice besides
that and the lack of correction in my court.
https://www.olyendomike.com/Bhutan-Bangkok-2017/i-MvBs6Cq/A
https://www.olyendomike.com/Bhutan-Bangkok-2017/i-L4j797C/A
If you just hit the first and go forward, the images can be compared. I think
it is fixed. I flipped back and forth with the Moose version and sems
comparable.
I used a hue/sat correction layer with red channel---Hue +13, sat -5, lightness
+4.
Just working on Magenta was not as effective in my hands.
If the modified gets the thumbs up, I'll remove the original.
On the other flower/cottage scene, you are technically correct on the similar
cast, but the light looks softer in the original and I don't mind it.
What's wrong with rose colored glasses, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|