Subject: | Re: [OM] Paph stack |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2022 12:30:29 -0800 |
On 1/1/2022 7:10 AM, Wayne Shumaker wrote: At 12/31/2021 03:45 PM, Mike wrote:Well, the exif is now fixed. I didn't have a snowball's chance of figuring out what Wayne was up to but did get out some very dusty references on batch files.Sorry about that. It is easier than it may appear, at least after you get it set up, but not for everyone. Bat files are so 1985ish. But a good year for OM-4s! An interesting thing about Exif data with GFX cameras using ISO invariance at https://blog.kasson.com/gfx-50s/gfs-50s-high-iso-behavior-and-lrc-development/ He says these cameras stop increasing gain at ISO 1600 and then just brighten the jpeg preview and send instructions to the raw converter to brighten the image. Great example of why the Maker Notes section of EXIF is wide open! Camera firmware communicating with converter software. Open Channel Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Magnetic Filter Adapters, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Calling all Pixel Peepers, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Paph stack, Wayne Shumaker |
Next by Thread: | [OM] PSTCRD : January 1st walk, Philippe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |