Subject: | Re: [OM] Hey, wait! I got a new complaint! |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:21:24 -0800 |
> I always thought this lens was a dog. This was similar to my experience with the 200/4 lens. I'm hard-pressed to come up with a sample image that was really sharp taken with this lens on most OM bodies. I say most, because the OM-2S had that shutter latency thing that seemed to help out quite a bit with some lenses. But that lens, on the digital bodies, has turned out to be exceptional. AG Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Hey, wait! I got a new complaint!, Jan Steinman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: Cooperative Monarch, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hey, wait! I got a new complaint!, Jan Steinman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Hey, wait! I got a new complaint!, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |