Subject: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic. |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Shumaker <om3ti@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 11 May 2021 20:27:51 -0700 |
At 5/11/2021 04:33 PM, Tetrachromate wrote: >But I admit to being a bit weird. Weird is good, right? Weirdish? > >AG (Sunstar) Schnozz More likely eccentric, offbeat, outlandish... WayneS -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Saguaro cactus blooming, Wayne Shumaker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Wayne Shumaker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |