On 2/26/2021 3:28 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Looks lie that com works quite well. Did you compare directly with the T132 on
that lens and the PL? Working distance is fine for critters too.
To do that, I would have needed to get up and move around. That wasn't part of that
day's remit. 😁
Longest focal distance for a T132 is 52 in. The closest subject, the little
wasp, was ~72 in.
Some nice boyd images on FM with it this lens with w/o either TC. Oly has boyd
eye AF but not on the E-m1 mk11 or mk111 afaik.
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/17/2118617.jpg
Impressive photo! Suffers slightly from both some over sharpening in places and loss of detail in belly and topknot.
Detail perhaps lost in NR?
Laziness works with those FL's, Mike
My kind of lens, then! 😉 The one problem with that is the size and weight. More tiring to hold and use than GX9 with
PL 100-400. I really noticed the weight. (TC adds nothing to weight, BTW.)
What Price Glory Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
| 