Correction below. Oly a bit slower—see max aperture at each FL in review.
Rushing to get home at work with no proof read of post. As feared, a bunch of
trees were down on my two usual ways and finally found a way around. Tree down
in driveway but minimally damage.
Wind blown, Mike
>
> A bit bigger, faster and sharper at wide apertures and compatible with 1.4
> and 2.0 TC, but slower. Seems odd they didn't make it work with sync IS but
> it is not a "pro" series lens. I do like the AS tripod foot but the
> advantage of the MFT IS system is to enable it to be handheld. If it somehow
> is the cat's meow with a 1.4 TC (prolly not really possible), I could be
> tempted--also like the weather sealing.
> Doubt Moose will be tempted as the PL works nicely with Dual IS and is more
> portable. Enjoyed the review and thought others might too.
>
>
>
> https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/micro-four-thirds-lenses/olympus-100-400mm-vs-panasonic-100-400mm/
>
> Taking the long view, , Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|