Thanks Mike - I learned something :-)
I wish you good luck with the experiments
Amities
Philippe
> Le 1 août 2020 à 22:23, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
> écrit :
>
> <<<Now why should one need two?
>
> Thanks for commenting, Philippe. Unlike lenses there is a point of
> diminishing return with subs. Unless a room is very specially designed
> standing waves will be set up and though the low freq are "loaded into the
> room" and should not be directional, that usually doesn't happen. Placement
> does matter as far as standing waves and bass response with corner loading
> enhancing the effects. White paper on some cool research below. Bottom
> line more subs lead to modal averaging and more even and often better
> response at more listening positions. Four subs well placed are about as
> good in a computer model as >100 and two nearly as good as four. I want to
> optimize for the MLP (major listening position--usually where the person
> taking the measurements sits), with little concern for the M-I-L (mother in
> law) seat. ;-) There seems to be special software (MSO--multi-sub
> optimizer) that can average out the response for multiple listening
> positions. As I understand it, that set of dsp
> results can be loaded into a mini DSP if desired.
>
>
>
> https://www.harman.com/documents/multsubs_0.pdf
>
> Two is better than one, Mike
>
> (does not apply to spouses)
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|