Many-pixeled Moose wrote:
> The XA is a marvel of design and execution. I loved everything about it, but
> the fixed FL, which drove me crazy. :-)
I was actually pretty OK with the fixed 35mm lens, but what I didn't
care for was the lack of manual-exposure and the diamond-shaped
aperture. Other than that, it was a huge pleasure to use and carry
with me everywhere.
> I know, I know, bigger sensors are better. But, you know, I spend a lot of
> time inside image files. I simply don't think
> about whether they are 16 MP 4/3", 20 MP 4/3" or 24 MP FF. They all process
> the same and give the same sort of results.
> In decent light, that applies to the 1" sensors in Panny ZS200 and Sony RX10
> IV, as well.
Or in my case 5 MP 4/3", 7.5 MP 4/3", 8 MP 4/3", 10 MP 4/3", 16 MP
4/3" or 24 MP FF. The biggest difference isn't sensor size, but sensor
design.
AG Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|