Subject: | Re: [OM] Mom |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 24 May 2020 19:56:52 -0700 |
Do I recall you saying that 12-200 lens wasn't sharp? :-) ATRA Moose I now thinking that it is the focusing that is off. My keeper rate is still pretty low. I often have to manual focus close before the auto focus locks. Sometimes I'm sure that I nailed focus only to get home and see that it was off. I should get out the old EM5i to see if it is the body. The 14-150 is reliably better at focus on this body (EM5ii) though. Let see if I can find an example... <http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Feb20/example1_2250014.jpg><http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Feb20/example2_2250014.jpg> The both should have been spot on. Willing subject at about 10-15m and a steady, braced position. f8 and was there. Decent shutter speed. The second is better and could be acceptable with LCE. Both cropped to show detail, pulled shadows. No sharpening. M -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Mom, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Early bird, ChrisB |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Mom, Nathan Wajsman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Mom, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |