Subject: | Re: [OM] Speaking of Color {was Olympus E-1 Color Magic] |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2020 23:10:28 +0000 (UTC) |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
<<I was really impressed with Kodak's final effort in film technology. <<The 2010/2011 versions of Portra 160 and 400 are simply incredible <<films. They scan better than anything else I've used. I had forgotten already that Ektar 100 came out in 2008 and the final version of Portra 160 in 2011. They used the advancements of Portra 400 into the new formulation. It seems to get punchy like ektar with lots of light but skin tones often better. Seems too muted for landscapes w/o profiling. Perhaps the Portra 160 scans better than Ektar--defer to AG on that. A company took a nice Koduck movie film and made rolls out of it--may be finer grain than the 160. Has anyone tried Cinestill 50D? https://www.thephoblographer.com/2015/05/24/review-cinestill-50d-film/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photographic_films#Color_negative_films_3 Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Portra 160 [was Speaking of Color [was Olympus E-1 Color Magic]], Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Speaking of Color {was Olympus E-1 Color Magic], Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Stonewall - Colorado Velvia Pictures, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Speaking of Color {was Olympus E-1 Color Magic], Jim Nichols |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |