> From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
> Question: What do you mean by Macro?
>
> 2. The lens that started this has a mag. of 0.21x. That sounds pretty low.
> But, it's for a 4/3" sensor. If I print equal
> size FF and 4/3 sensor shots of the same subject, filling the height of the
> film/sensor with it, the apparent
> magnification is the same, but the images on film/sensor are of much
> different sizes, FF ~ twice 4/3".
Thanks for the numbers.
All I know is that with the 50-200 SWD, I can get Really. Really Close.
To the point where, if I’m already carrying that lens and think I might want to
do macro, I don’t bring another lens; I throw the 25mm extension tube in the
bag.
Jan
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|