Subject: | Re: [OM] E-520 |
---|---|
From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:10:54 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
I found the shape of the E-500 easy to adjust to, even after 30 years of using the OM-1/2. The grip shape on the right side makes it easy to operate with one hand. The E-400 you have is pretty much the same shape. > >> For now I'm going to enjoy the warmth of pre-emptive smugness. > >The 520 is surprisingly a decent little camera. It fits me wrong as >it's a large camera shape in a small body. The lumps are all wrong. >But the camera itself is essentially an OM-D EM5 Mark 0.5 > Chris When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro - Hunter S. Thompson -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Monochrome, Tina Manley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Monochrome, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-520, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-520, Chris Trask |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |