Hmmm, this is a reply that lacks grace.
Chris
> On 31 Jan 2020, at 00:47, Christopher Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't, and didn't. Cropping tighter would have removed the context from
> the image; it would have been just another photo of a cat. It is part of a
> larger project documenting that book store, the Wells Street area, and Fort
> Wayne. Its part of a larger story, and your suggestion would prevent it from
> being a useful part of that story
>
>
> --
> Chris Crawford
> Fine Art Photography
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
> 260-437-8990
>
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com <http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com/> My
> portfolio
>
> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798>
> Like My Work on Facebook
> .
>
> On 1/30/20, 1:43 PM, "olympus on behalf of Moose"
> <olympus-bounces+chris=chriscrawfordphoto.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:olympus-bounces+chris=chriscrawfordphoto.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
> behalf of olymoose@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Excellent portrait!
>
> 'Twere mine, I'd crop tighter, both because I'd prefer the composition and
> to get rid of the awful bokeh, upper right.
>
> Alternatively, the bokeh could be burred.
>
> Purrrin' Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|