On 11/30/2019 6:37 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
Walk today
<http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Nov19/SBeach__B300031.JPG>
I've had the 12-200 for about 2 months now and still not sure what to think. Not that sharp...but what do you expect
for this zoom range. It really is a great walk about, travel lens but wish it was a bit sharper like the 14-150. Still
have to bring the 9-18 but not necessary to switch nearly as much. I was ready to return it but decided to give it a
chance. What do you think?
I dunno, looks pretty sharp to me. ;-)
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Mike/PuponRock.htm>
For me, photography has broadened to include software. Would I rather carry larger, heavier gear, or spend a little on
software and spend some time in post?
I did some practical testing of this in our Fall seven weeks in New England and Ireland, shooting several casual days
with Panny's 1" sensor 24-360 FF mm eq. superzoom.
I have no definitive answer for myself, as yet, but it is a real question of trade-offs that didn't exist until fairly
recently.
Although not without their faults, among them lengthy processing*, but with capabilities undreamed of but on CSI until
now, the change the equations.
* You are building a powerhouse PC, no?
Fence, Straddle, Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
