I understand what you mean, Philippe. It’s neither one nor the other.
Is that a patient companion waiting for you in the bokeh? :-)
Chris
> On 24 Sep 2019, at 13:31, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Display is standard iMac 24 - no enlargement, seen as offered.
>
> You may be right about the leaves on the sides of the path up to a certain
> extent, but not so, from my « point of view », about those on the ground and
> the the gravel of the path.
>
> When I see a view like this one, and I presume it was Ken’s intent, I want to
> show/see the depth in detail,
>
> e.g.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Low+tide+at+Cayeux+-+BW-0484.jpg.html
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Low+tide+at+Cayeux+-+BW-0484.jpg.html>
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Low+tide+at+Cayeux+-+BW-0484.jpg.html
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Low+tide+at+Cayeux+-+BW-0484.jpg.html>>
> (I know about the sky, the final version is not so gritty)
>
> OR,
>
> alternately, the background to dissolve in a « nice" bokeh and trigger the
> imagination (sample below)
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Strolling-Negative0-17-16A_.jpg.html
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Strolling-Negative0-17-16A_.jpg.html>
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Strolling-Negative0-17-16A_.jpg.html
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Strolling-Negative0-17-16A_.jpg.html>>
>
>
> Must be me, sorry :-(
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
