A Lysander in balsa wood, Jim? Wow, very impressive - there is a*lot* of
glazing to fit, how did you manage to hold the wings in place?
Having once lived about 15 miles away, I know the Shuttleworth collection
reasonably well, but I didn't know they had a Lysander. One of its more
important operating bases was maybe 10 miles north.
I will leave it to Wikipedia to fill in the details.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_Tempsford
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus <olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf Of Jim Nichols
Sent: 20 September 2019 16:10
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Focus Magic
Chris,
Thanks very much for the link to the Shuttleworth Collection. I did
quite a bit of exploration of the site. That is a very impressive
collection. I was happy to see the Lysander. That was the first balsa
and tissue scale model that I built, in the very early 1940s. It always
impressed me.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 9/20/2019 1:13 AM, ChrisB wrote:
> Bill
>
> It’s called the Avro Tutor, one of the Shuttleworth Collection which is near
> my home, at an airfield called Old Warden. The Collection is very interesting
> as most of them are flown in displays, but this is the Tutor page on the
> website:
>
> https://www.shuttleworth.org/collection/avrotutor/
>
> Chris
>
> C M I Barker | Gamlingay
>
>
>> On 19 Sep 2019, at 21:45, Bill Pearce <billpearce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>>
>> What is the biplane on the top or your home page? It sure doesn't look
>> anything like a Stearman.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:49:42 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OM] Focus Magic
>>
>> In Capture One I find myself using much more of the Clarity sliders than
>> Sharpening ones. I think that it’s a LCE adjustment, but the result is more
>> pleasing lighting as well as sharpness (apparent, I’m sure).
>>
>> This example has +34 of Clarity and Structure sliders applied, for instance:
>>
>> https://show.cbimages.uk/Photography/Blipfoto/i-kk2rzN6/A
>>
>> I am probably less discerning than some on the List, but it works well for
>> me, as in this example as well:
>>
>> https://show.cbimages.uk/Photography/Blipfoto/i-zNGBtxT/A
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 17 Sep 2019, at 22:00, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/17/2019 1:57 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>>> PESO:
>>>>
>>>> I recently had to reinstall Windows 10 and all of my Photoshop plug-ins had
>>>> to be reinstalled, too. The only one I've had problems with is Focus Magic
>>>> which I use a lot. I get a runtime error:
>>>> Runtime Error (at 5:198):
>>>> Internal Error: Failed to expand shell folder constant "userdocs"
>>>>
>>>> The software company is no help just saying that they've never seen that
>>>> error before and have no suggestions. I'm tired of messing with it and
>>>> started looking for a similar program. I downloaded SmartDeblur but it is
>>>> awful and nothing like Focus Magic.
>>> It's important, well, useful, to understand the differences in these
>>> programs.
>>>
>>> 1. The vast majority of sharpening programs/apps use UnSharp Mask, a
>>> technique inherited from film, where it was a physical technique. While
>>> powerful and useful in some ways, unsophisticated applications easily lead
>>> to troublesome artifacts. I have not used an USM for sharpening for a long
>>> time.
>>>
>>> 2. Deconvolution is another approach to sharpening that works by recreating
>>> detail lost in the aberrations on the lens. There are quite a few
>>> specialized versions that work from knowledge of the characteristics of
>>> specific lenses.
>>>
>>> Canon does that in their Raw conversion program. DPP. Some speculate that
>>> DxO uses deconvolution in their sharpening.
>>>
>>> The only generalized versions that I know are Focus Magic and Topaz
>>> InFocus. I did this comparison for another purpose, but it does provide
>>> some idea that Topaz IF will do pretty much what FM does, albeit with a
>>> different interface and settings.
>>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Focus_Magic/_B003950fpACRvsPlugin.htm
>>>
>>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Focus_Magic/_B003950fpACRvsPlugin.htm>>
>>>
>>> 3. The newest approach is AI, in the form of a trained neural network.
>>> Topaz Sharpen AI does this. It's both almost magic, and frustrating.
>>>
>>> Like other Topaz AI products, when it works, which is most of the time, it
>>> is head and shoulders above anything else I've seen. Also like their other
>>> AI apps, where it doesn't "understand" the subject, or some part of it, it
>>> can fail. I've also had an image where it didn't do anything obviously
>>> wrong, but it wasn't as nice a result as FM.
>>>
>>> It is also a machine eater, taking what seems forever to do a whole frame.
>>> Because it's slow, even at showing previews, getting to know the settings
>>> is also slow.
>>>
>>> How Sharp Moose
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|