Panasonic's website is a mess. If you use the "Micro 4/3" filter on bodies,
it eliminates the G95 and others....
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:01 PM Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9/10/2019 10:39 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
> > Right now, I'm really considering a GH-4.
>
> Wow, you really 'em big, heavy and, in this case, old.
>
> > DP Review really likes it,
>
> That should be "liked", past tense. If they reviewed it today, against
> contemporary models, it would not score high. The
> GH-4 is a couple of generations old. At the pixel level, it's
> significantly less clear than the G95, even slightly less
> clear in details than the E-M5 you've been using.
>
> Take a look here, and change a couple of the panes to G95 and E-M5.
> <https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dc-g95-g90-review/5>
> Then up the ISO, and watch as the GH-4 fuzzes out, compared to the others.
>
> Just sayin' Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Paul Braun WD9GCO
Anchor, Amateur Radio Newsline
www.ARnewsline.org <http://www.arnewsline.org>
Certified Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach
"The Fountain of Youth is a state of mind" -- The Ides of March, "Age
Before Beauty"
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|