On 8/29/2019 11:35 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
Might you have been slogging around in the mud too long, so a naturally clean
image is surprising? I have, over the last
few years, used both Panny and Oly µ4/3 bodies, and have never noticed any such
difference in the Raw files, as
converted by ACR, primarily, DxO, and a couple of others. DxO defaults look
different than ACR, but much the same
between brands.
I'm processing the images in the latest/greatest version of Lightroom Classic.
And, since I'm using ACR, we use the same Raw conversion engine.
I definitely see the effect and I didn't put it there. I'll show an
image tomorrow that perfectly illustrates it.
I'm interested. I've only processed a handful of images from the GX85, but over 400 from the GX9. I find it hard to
imagine they would have backed off whatever you are seeing with the next model.
Hmmm. I just opened a Panny GX85 file in LR Develop module for the first time. Sharpening, Amount 40, Radius 1.0, Detail
25. NR, Luminance 0, Color 25, 50, 50. Might ACR be tricking you?
With every new camera, I have to turn USM and NR to zero and save a new default profile for that camera, or I get
Adobe's idea of what its files need. In PS, it's possible to set Sharpening to "Preview Only", so the actual converted
file presented for editing is not affected. I don't see that option in LR,
There's a huge difference @ 100% between Adobe's default and no messing with
the image when converting it.
Just thinking out loud.
How Sharp Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|