The second one is lovely, Tina!
Chris
> On 25 Apr 19, at 22:22, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/25/2019 9:38 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> PESO:
>>
>> The focus is on the scarf, not her eyes, but I kind of like the soft focus
>> for the young girl. I added a little negative clarity to emphasize the
>> softness. What do you think?
>>
>> https://pbase.com/tinamanley/image/169108079
>
> I have nothing against soft, in principle, and sometimes do it, perhaps even
> to extremes? <https://photos.app.goo.gl/mrPXexQTKdhrU6N47>
>
> But I can't say I like an obviously misplaced plane of focus in portraits. It
> is possible to relocate that plane, if it's not too far out.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/SoftBeauty.htm>
>
>> A sharper one is next.
>
> Nice portrait. Plane of focus still a bit forward of the eyes. The same thing
> could be done to this one.
>
> The Eyes Have It Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|