That’s great, Jim. I remember being very happy with the lens, although having
to carry it was something to think about.
Chris
> On 15 Mar 2019, at 16:14, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Tina.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 3/15/2019 10:43 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> I think you are going to have fun with that lens. As long as you have
>> plenty of light, it looks great!
>>
>> Tina
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Frank, I think it was me, not the lens. The differences you noted in
>>> the second paragraph were due to weather. Clouds have been around all
>>> day today.
>>>
>>> I got this grab shot at the bird bath later today, tilting the camera up
>>> against the window to capture the edge of the bird bath. It came out fine.
>>>
>>> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190314-P3147889.JPG.html
>>>
>>> I think I just need more experience with the gear. I'm not, at least at
>>> this time, sending it back.
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>
>>> On 3/14/2019 3:18 PM, Frank wrote:
>>>> Hmm... the SWD picture is unsharp and/or shaken, I don't think you can
>>>> conclude anything from that picture. Except that the lens is a lemon if
>>> you
>>>> can't get it any better.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed 1/100 for the SWD version and 1/320 & 1/500 for Takumar
>>> versions
>>>> though (which I like btw). Could that explain the difference?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
