I have the 25mm 1.8 and I like it. Sharp (& wide open), light, fast AF.
Many reviews acknowlegde this.
>From tests I gather that the 1.2 is slightly softer wide open, with a T
stop of 1.8, which I think kind of defeats its purpose or part of it. I
couldn't find a value for the 1.8 but it is probably around 2 (the
Panasonic is).
Unfortunately, Dxo hasn't tested the 1.8. But there is this
<https://www.dxomark.com/olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-25mm-f-1-2-pro-lens-review-solid-choice/>
.
If I would buy an 1.2 I'd go for the 17mm, as reviews indicate that it is
sharper wide open. For my photography, it is also more versatile.
Op ma 7 jan. 2019 om 20:45 schreef Mike Bloor <admin@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Does anyone have recommendations on a 25mm lens for the OM-D range? I
> was initially thinking of Pany/Leica f/1.4, but reading reviews by
> people who bought both that and the Olympus f/1.8, most ended up
> selling the Pany and keeping the Olympus.
>
> How does the Pany f/1.7 compare with the Olympus f/1.8, apart from
> being a good deal cheaper?
>
> I don't think I'll be considering the Olympus f/1.2.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|