Well, there are methods available:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46639099
I assume the UK military has some of these available.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA
> On 20 Dec 2018, at 21:57, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Because anything that missed would have to land somewhere. A shotgun would
> not have the range, and a rifle round would travel for a long way before
> hitting the ground, or something else.
>
> And a drone is too small for any sort of SAM ;-)
>
> In addition, the Transport Secretary has promised “technology”; which
> suggests to me that he hasn’t a clue
>
> Chris
>
>> On 20 Dec 18, at 20:32, Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What I do not understand is why the authorities do not just shoot them down.
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|