Subject: | Re: [OM] TETRACHROMACY |
---|---|
From: | ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:11:50 +0000 |
Very interesting, Mike, thanks. I had to use my dictionary a few times . . . >From the article that I heard, only women are tetrochromats. Chris > On 29 Oct 18, at 23:54, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Haven't read about this in awhile. Much data came out in Neitz lab in > Seattle and Jordan. > > https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2191517 > <https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2191517> > > > There was only a functional test in past using silk swatches. Curiously they > only tested women of course as it is essentially impossible for men to be > tetrachromat. In above study only a very small percentage of women > genetically shown to have the anomalous trichromacy or tetrachromat could > actually use it. In the early functional studies there were some men > (working daily with color) that could perceive the same number of hues. > Whether this held up > with true genetically determined tetrachromats that are highly functional > tetrachromats I do not know. Post processing does play a role as well as the > pattern of the anomalous cone distribution as determined by random X > inactivation. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Tetrachromacy, ChrisB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: more cycling and working and other mundane stuff..., Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] TETRACHROMACY, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TETRACHROMACY, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |