Maybe a compromise like this
<https://www.flickr.com/photos/63142137@N08/30507065567/in/dateposted-public/>
works, with only a small portion of the blur left (by masking, the overlay
of the flower is ok). I like the butterfly to be clear and sharp.
Op wo 17 okt. 2018 om 16:13 schreef Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 10/17/2018 2:13 AM, ChrisB wrote:
> > I’ve managed to open them in Safari, so all is well; and they are great.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I particularly like both of the shots of the butterfly on a red flower.
>
> Well, that's no help! ;-) The one with the soft bottom was, I thought, a
> mistake when I took it; corrected with the
> other. A closer flower OoF gave the blurry look. But then, I rather liked
> the 'wrong' one.
>
> I was thinking feedback might help me choose.
>
> Fence Top Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|