Dark Horse-meat Moose wrote:
> Nice image and processing!
Thank you. The scenes here almost photograph themselves.
> Depending on what one wants to do, PS has added over recent years tools that
> are leading edge.
Features, yes. Workflow, no.
>> HOWEVER, there are times when I'll prototype
>> everything in Lightroom and then do the actual work in Photoshop.
>
> I don't understand that process, I go directly to the master tool.
With Lightroom, I can take a look at a selection of photographs, do
some quick whipping of the sliders to see if anything interesting
happens, and then go from there. The Bridge-Photoshop workflow assumes
that you have an idea of what you want to do with an image before you
start. I'm not that good. I like to bend the levers to see what
screams in delight.
> Virtually every image I process uses layers and masks.
I'd be slicing my wrists...
> So if you can't use it and don't know how it has changed as LR has changed,
> denigrate it??
Nah. Not at all. Photoshop is chuck full of awesomeness for you
stuck-in-2000-guys. ;)
AG (E1-forever) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|