I’m definitely not an M guy either , I prefer to see through the lens to seeing
the lens ;-)
The Rs and their optics were excellent, I had three of them, that after the
OM2n, the Nikkormat, etc ;-)
The digital SL is too heavy both in grams and pounds (read bucks) for me to
consider rebuilding a line of kidney-lenses.
Amities
Philippe
> Le 16 avr. 2018 à 06:49, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On 4/13/2018 2:21 AM, Philippe wrote:
>> ...
>> And I’m very very thankful to him for all he does for us and for photography.
>>
>> I quote : "The last time we (read Brian as the saloon-keeper) looked
>> -January 2018- there were 846,024 messages in the archives. Many of them are
>> actually on topic, which is to say, about photography by people who admire
>> Leica cameras »
>
> I admire Leica cameras - - - as long as I don't have to use them. :-)
>
> Exception for the SL, which is only too large, heavy, expensive and short of
> lens options so far, but emphatically mirrorless with EVF, not rangefinder.
>
> Just never liked rangefinders. Partly the rangefinder itself as a means of
> focus, partly the limited range of FLs.
>
> Waaaay back when; fondle Leica, buy Nikon SLR. Nikkor-Q 200/4 - Oh Yeah.
>
> Beautiful Machines Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|