Mike,
I have no share in Adobe’s business. Their products have always proved useful,
reliable, and most importantly exceed my expectations and open new horizons
(face recognition being the last one I experimented).
I consider that a subscription fee is marginal compared to what I (or Alice)
spend on the gear, the trips we make, and more importantly, the family
gatherings we throw; all things considered, we’ve already spent more on just
chocolate eggs and bunnies this Easter for the pack, than the annual cost for
LR …
LR simply is part of a prolonged pleasure when the gorgeously nasty weather
and/or time allow me to take care of my life long hobby.
Hope this helps
Amities
Freshly retired Philippe, and a technology hater ;-)
> Le 28 mars 2018 à 22:03, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> a écrit :
>
> Thanks. Adobe certainly is using confusing new nomenclature. The new CC LR
> non classic does not look ready for prime time for many purposes, does indeed
> require win 10 and is of minimal use to me. It clearly is aimed at a
> different market.
> I wonder if there are any cataloging /image management programs superior to
> LR? It did not appear to be the case, last I looked about one year ago.
>
> Mike
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|