My first experience with it doesn't impress me.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Focus%20Stacking/BracketvsStack/FSvsFB.htm>
I chose a test subject that's deep, like many of my practical subjects. Unlike too many of them, it doesn't move around
in a breeze. :-) All shots with the camera on a tripod, no changes to settings, etc., remote release.
The first framing I stacked with 25 slices, but only needed 15. The in-camera stacking, of course, used eight slices.
For the second framing, I only needed 7 slices from the bracket.
The whole thing is sort of mysterious:
It appears that it will do focus however it wants. It may be that it looks at nearest and furthest focus points and
makes a decision as to what to do.
Sets of eight JPEGs and ORFs are saved to the card, as well as a single JPEG of the combined stack. All the individual
slices are the same size as a single shot. The Stack is cropped significantly, then enlarged to fill the whole standard
image pixel size, as may be seen in the link. I had set the second framing with a bit of "air" around the subject to
crop for the final display version. The Focus Stacking enlarged it so much that parts were cut off.
In the first view, 100% samples, it's obvious that nearest and furthest parts are soft because the are outside the DoF
of the Stack. The other general softness may be, at least in part, a result of the upsizing.
In the second view, the lesser depth, relative to the lens DoF at different FL and distance, so only 7 slices of the
brackets were needed, the Stacking was much more effective.
Focusing for the two different processes is quite different. For Stacking, the camera seems to decide where to focus.
For Bracketing, it starts with the place where the lens is focused, and works out toward infinity. So getting focus on
the closest point is really important.
For these examples, I used MF and magnification to focus - and somehow blew it slightly on the second - brushed the
ring? Hand held in the field, I use the smallest single AF point on the closest part, then try to move back just a tiny
bit, to assure closest focus. I don't mind if the first slice is slightly too close, but if it's too far, the stack may
not work.
So far, I can't see any use for the Focus Stacking function for me. It just does a poorer job than a bracket. Fine for
web size images, I suppose. It also only works with a couple of my lenses. A lot of my finest focus bracket/stacked
images have been taken with the PLeica 100-400. It's also a real pain to turn on and off via the Menus, so would only be
practical in a Myset or on a Custom setting.
No Stacks Moose
On 2/28/2018 1:27 PM, Moose wrote:
On 2/28/2018 1:07 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
Not much there unless you own one of those supported lenses...did it anyway.
(shrug.gif)
Only one I had from the old list was the 60/2.8 Macro. However, they added the
12-100, which I do have.
Comparison test under way . . .
D. o. F. Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|