> Ken, I am always interested in that Oly's Viewer 3 is never listed as a
> candidate. I had understood that -- at least as far as Raw conversion is
> concerned - this is quite good, perhaps the best with Oly cameras. I
> understand that nothing else is good in terms of processing capabilities,
> but I find that doing Raw conversion with Viewer, saved to TIFF files, then
> using LR and FM for downstream processing, was pretty good. The batch
> processing works well.
Viewer3 does a really good job with the colors, but I have three issues with it:
1. Not as sharp to the pixel level.
2. Highlight Recovery is pretty bad.
3. Deep blue skies will get banding.
AG Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|