Since the advent of digital the quality of commercial film processing seems to
have gone downhill considerably.
...Wayne
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Feb 2018, at 12:23 pm, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have yet to see a speck on the E-M1-Mk1ii. The OM's get a brand new dust
>> free sensor each image.
>
> Of the three prehistoric 4/3 cameras in my cave, the E-1 remains the
> most dust-free of the bunch, followed by the DMC-L1 and finally
> dragging up the rear is the E-3. However, for whatever reason, the E-3
> seems to be the easiest to blow the dust bunnies off of.
>
> I do agree that the OM bodies are "spot on" in the "spot free" world.
> Nothing like getting a shiny clean sensor every picture. But the
> problem is that in post-processing and image-handling, dust and
> scratches are a real problem. As I'm sure you can relate. :(
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|