Bill,
I have the original OM-D E-M1(not mark II) and have been very pleased with the
performance with my original 4/3 lenses. I am using the 12-60 and 50-200 SWD
lenses and they focus as fast and as reliably as the did in the E5 as far as I
can tell.
Jim
Sent from BlueMail
On Jan 17, 2018, 2:38 PM, at 2:38 PM, Bill Barber via olympus
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I've ridden the Olympus horse for many years, starting with the OM
>series film cameras and then after a few years on the fence to the e-1,
>e-3 and finally e-5 cameras. At this point I felt Olympus had basically
>deserted the folks in the trenches. I was heavily invested in there
>system, both from the standpoint of bodies but also glass. Having sat
>on the sidelines for several years watching Sony and am close to
>pulling the trigger (that means sometime this year) on the Sony a7r
>III. I'm at the point where lighter is better. Just got a mailer from
>Olympus promoting their OM-D E-M1 III as a good transition for the
>e-thingy users. two questions? Is anybody really seriously satisfied
>with using their e-glass with this 20 megapixel camera? Is there any
>compelling reason to not go with the Sony. Bill "On the proverbial
>fence" Barber
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|