On 4/1/2017 1:51 PM, John Hudson wrote:
On 2017-04-01 9:42 PM, Moose wrote:
On 4/1/2017 9:47 AM, John Hudson wrote:
I normally resize my images to 1,000 x 666 pixels at 100ppi resolution.
You have not provided adequate information to simply answer your question.
Not knowing what you don't know, but knowing enough when asking a question with the intention of drawing out salient
information from respondents should not automatically generate a superior attitude snotty comment such as yours !
Was I being snotty - or explaining beforehand why you were getting a long, possibly complicated seeming answer, instead
of a brief, simple one. Did you notice the signature? TMI is shorthand for Too Much Information. I should not have split
the infinitive, writing instead " . . . to answer your question simply." That would have read better and better
conveyed that idea.
Did you notice that mine was the only reply that focused specifically on your questions, without wandering off into
means of storage and communication? No one else said how large your images would be on screen, or whether they would, or
would seem to be, poorer quality than on the computer monitor.
Also, I see an important typo. Should read "On our 53" wide, 1080p screen, a 1000 pixel wide image will display at ~27"
width."
Un Simple Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|