Subject: | Re: [OM] On topic, well, could be ... |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:11:33 -0500 |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Couple more comments. Would not totally dismiss the newly designed Panny 100-300 ii --very few reviews out yet. The IS is the latest version and clearly better than the previous incarnation. Comparison of the older version with the mighty Panny Leica 100-400 here : http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2016/03/10/panasonic-100-400mm-vs-100-300mm/ The new version has some CA and the corners at 300 are not perfect so I would surmise the 100-400 is better at 400 than the 100-300 is at 300 but bet it is fairly close. I do like my Panny/L 100-400 and can't beat the flexibility. The rendering of the Oly 300 Plus TC I think is better under many conditions though that is an impression. Doesn't make sense to get the Oly unless it is to be used on very new Oly body. I am not sure about the Professor Moose's comments on the extender/Teleconverter (TC). When I hear safari, I had thought it more likely it to be used to extend reach at distant focusing distance and not increase mag at or near MFD. It is also an interesting conjecture that the exit pupil distance to the sensor matters more for lens performance even with MFT lenses due to the thick sensor stack. I have only seen the exit pupil distance mentioned as a known important variable when using lenses designed for different sensor stack thickness- what we clearly know: 1) Difference between actual stack thickness and designed stack thickness. (zero for film) 2) Exit pupil distance (shorter distance gives more problems) 3) Aperture (wider aperture gives more problems) 4) Angle of view (wide angle gives more problems) Putting an extension tube on a MFT lens may be fine but would anticipate some issues with lenses with floating elements. Some lenses just don't behave well with extension and the reasons remain mysterious to me. I recall a few e-mail exchanges with Tamron tech many years ago--they said best to use the matched TC on the vaunted Tam 80-200 to increase mag then use extension. Now I have really drifted off topic even more. Fan of Professor Moose, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: No Win10, Philippe Amard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Practicing Exposure Control, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] On topic, well, could be ..., SwissPace |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] On topic, well, could be ..., Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |