I concur with what AG wrote in his 1st #, works better so.
Amities
Philippe
2017-01-23 16:40 UTC+01:00, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> I think the luminance noise reduction is whats taking the magic sauce (as
>> ag would say) away from the raw files compared to jpegs which is why i
>> tried with dfine2 - somewhere I think i have noise ninja, maybe I try with
>> that.
>
> With little exception, I'm cranking the snot out of the chroma noise
> reduction in LR, but am very careful about the luminance noise
> reduction. Unless I want my pictures looking like they're covered in
> Saran Wrap, I rarely go above 25 on that slider. But, keep in mind
> that I'm pretty aggressive with the sharpening. I usually set
> sharpening first and then adjust the noise reduction to get my grit
> under control. Others set the noise reduction first and then try to
> sharpen up what's left.
>
> The big difference that I'm seeing in LR has to do with the Canon 6D
> files. If I use the Adobe profile, it really stinks up the show. But
> if I use the Canon profiles, it is actually almost acceptable. With
> the Olympus and Panasonic files, I only have Adobe profiles, so I have
> to get creative in my adjustments.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|